Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 03.07.1997 - 28626/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,23016) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHRISTIANSKO SDRUZHENIE «SVIDETELI NA IEHOVA» c. BULGARIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Recevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHRISTIANSKO SDRUZHENIE \
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.07.1997 - 28626/95
Accordingly the Court has recognised that Article 26 (Art. 26) must be applied in a manner corresponding to the reality of the applicant's situation, with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see Eur. Court HR, Airey v. Ireland judgement of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 12 para. 23; Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18 para. 34; Akdivar v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, para. 69, to be published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.07.1997 - 28626/95
Accordingly the Court has recognised that Article 26 (Art. 26) must be applied in a manner corresponding to the reality of the applicant's situation, with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see Eur. Court HR, Airey v. Ireland judgement of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 12 para. 23; Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18 para. 34; Akdivar v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, para. 69, to be published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996). - EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12875/87
HOFFMANN c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.07.1997 - 28626/95
Also, the applicant association submits that the Court has already dealt with this issue in Hoffmann v. Austria (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 255-C).
- EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 31806/96
DIMOVA v. BULGARIA
There having been no indication that the application was knowingly based on untrue facts (cf. No. 28626/95, Dec. 3.7.97), the Commission further rejects as unsubstantiated the assertion of the Government that there has been an abuse of the right to petition within the meaning of Article 27 para.