Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 11489/85 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1986,12016) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
D. v. IRELAND
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
D. c. IRLANDE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 11489/85
The Commission is satisfied therefore that having regard to the previous case-law of the Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R. König judgment of 28.6.78, Series A no. 28, Application No. 7116/75, Dec. 4.10.76, D.R. 7 p. 91 and Application No. 8366/78, Dec. 8.3.79, D.R. 16 p. 196) the proceedings, including both the appeal and the motions which were ancillary to the appeal, concerned the determination of civil rights and accordingly that Article 6 para. - EKMR, 08.03.1979 - 8366/78
X. v. LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 11489/85
The Commission is satisfied therefore that having regard to the previous case-law of the Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R. König judgment of 28.6.78, Series A no. 28, Application No. 7116/75, Dec. 4.10.76, D.R. 7 p. 91 and Application No. 8366/78, Dec. 8.3.79, D.R. 16 p. 196) the proceedings, including both the appeal and the motions which were ancillary to the appeal, concerned the determination of civil rights and accordingly that Article 6 para. - EKMR, 04.10.1976 - 7116/75
X. c. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 11489/85
The Commission is satisfied therefore that having regard to the previous case-law of the Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R. König judgment of 28.6.78, Series A no. 28, Application No. 7116/75, Dec. 4.10.76, D.R. 7 p. 91 and Application No. 8366/78, Dec. 8.3.79, D.R. 16 p. 196) the proceedings, including both the appeal and the motions which were ancillary to the appeal, concerned the determination of civil rights and accordingly that Article 6 para.