Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 27866/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,32436) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARKKULA v. FINLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 01.12.1986 - 11949/86
D.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 27866/95
Furthermore, the Commission has recognised that the procedural guarantees of Article 6 (Art. 6) take precedence over those of Article 13 (Art. 13) where a "civil right" is at issue, because the guarantees of this Article are more rigorous than those of Article 13 (Art. 13) (see e.g. No. 11949/86, Dec. 1.12.86, D.R. 51, p. 195).Property transfers which take place in the context of the settlement of relations between individuals do not normally amount to deprivation of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 (Art. 1), notwithstanding the fact that the State through its courts may have provided a forum for such a settlement (see No. 8588/79 & 8589/79, Dec. 12.10.82, D.R. 29, p. 64 and No. 11949/86, Dec. 1.12.86, D.R. 51, p. 195).
- EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 27866/95
In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols (cf. Eur. Court HR, Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, para. 45). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 27866/95
The task of the Convention organs is to ascertain whether the proceedings, considered as a whole, were fair (cf. e.g. Eur. Court HR, Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43 and the reference therein). - EKMR, 12.10.1982 - 8588/79
BRAMELID and MALMSTRÖM v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 27866/95
Property transfers which take place in the context of the settlement of relations between individuals do not normally amount to deprivation of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 (Art. 1), notwithstanding the fact that the State through its courts may have provided a forum for such a settlement (see No. 8588/79 & 8589/79, Dec. 12.10.82, D.R. 29, p. 64 and No. 11949/86, Dec. 1.12.86, D.R. 51, p. 195).