Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 32603/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,29752) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EVCEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 32603/96
Although the Commission has doubts whether the applicant's situation is comparable to the situation in the case of Niemietz (Eur. Court HR, Niemietz v. Germany judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B), it accepts that the entry at issue constituted an interference with the applicant's rights under Article 8 para. - EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83
HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 32603/96
If a law confers a discretion on a public authority, it must indicate the scope of that discretion, although the degree of precision required will depend upon the particular subject-matter (cf. Eur. Court HR, Herczegfalvy v. Austria judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 27, paras. 88-89). - EKMR, 04.07.1984 - 10689/83
ALTMANN (Barbie) c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 32603/96
In determining whether an interference was "in accordance with the law", it is primarily for the national authorities to interpret domestic law, but the Convention institutions have a limited jurisdiction to control the manner in which this is done (cf. No. 10689/83, Dec. 14.5.84, D.R. 37, p. 225).