Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 35125/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,26564) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90
PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 35125/97
Journalistic freedom in particular also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (Eur. Court HR, Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, para. 38). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 35125/97
The limits of permissible criticism are wider in respect of the Government, or of a political figure, than in relation to a private citizen (cf. Eur. Court HR, Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 23, para. 46).
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 5962/03
MAKARENKO v. RUSSIA
Firstly, the Court is convinced that the statement that Mr M. had organised an attempt to murder the applicant was clearly an allegation of fact and as such susceptible to proof (see, among many other authorities, McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, § 83, ECHR 2002-III; Steel and Morris, cited above, §§ 90 in fine and 94; and Panev v. Bulgaria, no. 35125/97, Commission decision of 3 December 1997, unreported). - EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 36207/03
RUMYANA IVANOVA v. BULGARIA
The statement that Mr M. D. featured on the list compiled by the Bulgarian National Bank through his ownership of three specifically named companies was clearly an allegation of fact and as such susceptible to proof (see, among many other authorities, McVicar, § 83; Steel and Morris, §§ 90 in fine and 94, both cited above; and Panev v. Bulgaria, no. 35125/97, Commission decision of 3 December 1997, unreported).