Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHRYSOSTOMOS, PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU AND LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY

  Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 9, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 57 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHRYSOSTOMOS, PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU ET LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE

  Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 9, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 57 MRK
  Partiellement recevable partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1991 - 15299/89

  The Commission also recalls that the Convention is intended to guarantee "not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" (Eur. Court H.R., Artico judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37 p. 34 para. 33).
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1991 - 15299/89

  The Commission recalls that the Court, when finding that an interpretative declaration by Switzerland did not satisfy two of the requirements of Article 64 (Art. 64) of the Convention, "with the result that it must be held to be invalid", found it at the same time "beyond doubt that Switzerland is, and regards itself as, bound by the Convention irrespective of the validity of the declaration" (Belilos judgment of 29 April 1988, Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 132 p. 28 para. 60).

• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  They also contended that the Commission, in its decision as to the admissibility of the present application, had not interpreted the decision in Chrysostomos and Papachrysostomou v. Turkey correctly (nos. 15299/89 and 15300/89, Commission's report of 8 June 1993, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86-A, p. 4).

  The President of the Security Council... also stressed the need strictly to respect the... buffer-zone." (See Chrysostomos and Papachrysostomou v. Turkey, nos. 15299/89 and 15300/89, Commission's report of 8 July 1993, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86-A, pp.

• EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY

  D'ailleurs, la Commission a interprété dans le même sens les termes et la ponctuation identiques des déclarations de la Turquie relatives à l'article 25 (art. 25) (voir la décision sur la recevabilité des requêtes nos 15299/89, 15300/89 et 15318/89 (jointes), Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou et Loizidou c. Turquie du 4 mars 1991, Décisions et rapports (D. R.) 68, pp.
• EGMR, 14.12.2011 - 13216/05

  CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA

  Ainsi, la présente affaire se distinguerait manifestement de l'affaire Loizidou c. Turquie ([GC], no 15318/89, CEDH 1996-VI).

  Elle avait retenu la même approche dans sa décision sur la recevabilité de l'affaire Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou et Loizidou c. Turquie (nos 15299/89, 15300/89 et 15318/89, DR 68, p. 287) à propos du grief tiré par la troisième requérante du refus continu de la laisser accéder à ses biens situés dans la partie nord de Chypre.