Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1998,31729
EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31729)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 04.03.1998 - 28994/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31729)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 04. März 1998 - 28994/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31729)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,31729) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

    LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95
    The Court noted that in any event the European Court of Human Rights had found no violation in respect of such a complaint in the case of Lüdi v. Switzerland (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238).

    He refers in particular to the Commission's opinion in the case of Lüdi v. Switzerland (Comm. Report 6.12.90, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 238) and submits that the Court's judgment in the case overlooked certain points.

    The Commission notes the Federal Court's judgment of 21 March 1995 on the applicant's public law appeal according to which the applicant had insufficiently raised this complaint, though it then considered that in any event the European Court had found no violation in respect of such a complaint in the case of Lüdi v. Switzerland (Eur. Court HR, jugment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238).

    In view thereof, the present case falls to be distinguished from that of Lüdi v. Switzerland (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 21, para. 49).

  • EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

    KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95
    The Jury Court considered this situation ex officio and found that the lawyer had remained absent purely out of protest... The Court President had drawn his attention to the fact that he would thus intentionally waive his right to put questions to the incriminating witness... The applicant thus participated personally in the proceedings and could personally put questions and dispute the incriminating statements... The Court extensively questioned the witness in public proceedings and was able to obtain certainty in the case on the basis of the earlier statements, the notes for the file and the other witnesses and telephone monitorings, and in particular compare these statements with those of the applicant... Thus, the case clearly differs from the case of Kostovski v. the Netherlands (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 23 May 1989, Series A no. 166, paras. 42 et seq., 16 et seq.).

    It also differs from the cases of Kostovski and Van Mechelen and others v. the Netherlands (see Eur. Court HR, judgments of 20 November 1989 and 23 April 1997, Series A no. 166, and Reports 1997-III, No. 36).

  • EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86

    Windisch ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95
    The subsequent use of their statements by the trial court to found a conviction is however capable of raising issues under the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186, p. 11, para. 30).
  • EGMR, 19.12.1990 - 11444/85

    DELTA c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95
    1 and 3 (d) (Art. 6-1+6-3-d) taken together (see Eur. Court HR, Delta v. France judgment of 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, p. 15, para. 34).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

    ASCH v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 28994/95
    The Convention organs' task is to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see Eur. Court HR, Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 26).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht