Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 15919/89 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,31722) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PALUMBO v. ITALY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 15919/89
- EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 15919/89
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 15919/89
He refers to the case-law of the Convention organs, and in particular to the De Jong and Van der Brink judgment (see Eur. Court HR, De Jong and Van der Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77) to the effect that when a State seeks to rely on the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies, it falls to the State to prove that the remedy they indicate has the requisites of accessibility and effectiveness.It falls for the respondent State to establish that these various conditions are satisfied (see Eur. Court HR, De Jong, Baljet and Van der Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39; amongst others, nos. 14807/89, Dec. 12.2.92, D.R. 72, p. 148; 12742/87, Dec. 3.5.89, D.R. 61, p. 206 and 14992/89, Dec. 7.6.90, D.R. 66, p. 247).
- EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 15919/89
As regards the second part of the Government's objections, the Commission recalls that when an individual, as under Italian law, is not entitled to apply directly to the Constitutional Court for a review of the constitutionality of certain legislation, he does not have available to him in this respect a remedy whose exhaustion is required under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (see Eur. Court H R, Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, p. 16, par. 34; Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 19, par. 20). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10964/84
BROZICEK v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 15919/89
As regards the second part of the Government's objections, the Commission recalls that when an individual, as under Italian law, is not entitled to apply directly to the Constitutional Court for a review of the constitutionality of certain legislation, he does not have available to him in this respect a remedy whose exhaustion is required under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (see Eur. Court H R, Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, p. 16, par. 34; Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 19, par. 20).