Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TRØBER v. NORWAY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  The Commission has accepted that in some cases a virulent press campaign can adversely affect the fairness of a trial and involve the State's responsibility, particularly where it is sparked off by one of the State's organs (cf., for example, No. 10486/83, Hauschildt v. Denmark, Dec. 9.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 86 with further references).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  2 (Art. 6-2) if they state that a suspicion exists, that people have been arrested, that they have confessed, etc. What is excluded, however, is a formal declaration that somebody is guilty (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Allenet de Ribemont judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, paras. 35-38).
• EKMR, 08.05.1978 - 7761/77

  X. c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  Furthermore, in accordance with the Commission's established case-law, proceedings concerning applications for retrial fall outside the scope of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, since a person applying for a retrial, having been finally convicted of a criminal offence, is no longer a person charged with that offence within the meaning of that Article (see e.g. No. 7761/77, Dec. 8.5.78, D.R. 14 p. 171).

 
• EKMR, 13.12.1982 - 9453/81

  X. c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  Furthermore, in accordance with the generally recognised rules of international law, the Convention or its Protocols only govern, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to their entry into force with respect to that Party (see e.g. No. 9453/81, Dec. 13.12.82, D.R. 31 p. 204).
• EKMR, 16.07.1976 - 5573/72

  A., B., C., D., E., F., G., H. et I. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  On this point the Commission refers to its constant case-law (cf. for example, No. 6861/75, Dec. 14.7.75, D.R. 3 p. 147; Nos. 5573/72 and 5670/72, Dec. 16.7.76, D.R. 7 p. 8).
• EKMR, 14.07.1975 - 6861/75

  X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  On this point the Commission refers to its constant case-law (cf. for example, No. 6861/75, Dec. 14.7.75, D.R. 3 p. 147; Nos. 5573/72 and 5670/72, Dec. 16.7.76, D.R. 7 p. 8).
• EKMR, 08.10.1982 - 9054/80

  A. v. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 21863/93

  The Commission notes that while serving a sentence in a prison is by its nature a limitation on private and family life, it is an essential part of a prisoner's right to respect for family life that prison authorities assist him in maintaining effective contact with his close family members (cf., mutatis mutandis, No. 9054/80, Dec. 8.10.82, D.R. 30 p. 113).