Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 19769/92 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,27502) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.H.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EKMR, 10.03.1989 - 12013/86
ALBERTI contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 19769/92
The Commission recalls at the outset that it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights or freedoms set out in the Convention (cf. No. 12013/86, Dec. 10.3.1989, D.R. 59 p. 111). - EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 19769/92
2 and 3 (d) of Article 6 (Art. 6-2, 6-3-d) are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1 (Art. 6-1), the Commission will consider the complaints under the three provisions taken together (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10 para. 25). - EKMR, 04.07.1979 - 8414/78
X. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 19769/92
More in particular, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the declarations of the witness involved (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.1979, D.R. 17 p. 231).