Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,20701) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45). - EKMR, 12.10.1988 - 12164/86
AGNEESSENS contre la BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
Recalling that to exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention the person concerned must have raised before the national authorities, at least in substance, the complaint he puts before the Commission (cf. No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63), the Commission finds that it is therefore not competent to deal with this aspect of the applicant's complaint. - EKMR, 04.07.1984 - 10689/83
ALTMANN (Barbie) c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
The Commission recalls that it is primarily the task of national authorities to apply and interpret domestic law, but that the Convention organs have a limited jurisdiction to control the manner in which it is done (cf. No. 10689/83, Dec. 14.5.84, D.R. 37 p. 225).
- EKMR, 04.12.1978 - 8239/78
X. v. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251). - EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 8278/78
X. v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251). - EKMR, 15.05.1980 - 8317/78
McFEELEY et al. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45). - EKMR, 10.12.1984 - 10435/83
ACMANNE and others v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251). - EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 10491/83
ANGELENI v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
In respect of the applicant's complaints that urine samples taken in prison are not properly sealed and that there are no rules as to whether or not these samples should be kept and how a countercheck could be carried out, the Commission recalls that it only examines the personal situation of the applicant and not the general scope of the laws applied to him (cf. No.10491/83, Dec. 3.12.86, D.R. 51 p. 41). - EKMR, 08.10.1982 - 9054/80
A. v. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45).
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 58481/18
LENOIR RIZZO c. FRANCE
La requête ne pose pas, selon lui, une question de principe qui serait nouvelle, qu'il s'agisse du consentement du patient (décisions de la Commission dans les affaires X. c. Autriche, no 8278/78, 13 décembre 1979, Acmanne et autres c. Belgique, no 10435/83, 10 décembre 1984 et Peters c. Pays-Bas, no 21132/93, 6 avril 1994) ou de la confidentialité des données médicales (Z c. Finlande, 25 février 1997, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-I). - EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 29033/95
SANDRÉN v. SWEDEN
The Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (see, e.g., No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 75, 79). - EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 25708/94
R.G. v. THE NETHERLANDS
The Commission recalls that, in order to exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, an applicant must have raised before the national courts, either in form or in substance, the complaints submitted to the Commission (cf. No. 11425/85, Dec. 5.10.87, D.R. 53 p. 76, and No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77 p. 75). - EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 29034/95
CIESLAR v. SWEDEN
The Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (see, e.g., No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 75, 79). - EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36986/97
DU BOIS v. THE NETHERLANDS
As regards the applicant's assertion that the Netherlands Supreme Court incorrectly interprets the notion of "material evidence" in that this term should also include all methods of investigation, the Commission recalls that it only examines the personal situation of an applicant and not the general scope of the laws applicable to him (No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77, p. 75).