Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1994,20701
EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93 (https://dejure.org/1994,20701)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 06.04.1994 - 21132/93 (https://dejure.org/1994,20701)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 06. April 1994 - 21132/93 (https://dejure.org/1994,20701)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,20701) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45).
  • EKMR, 12.10.1988 - 12164/86

    AGNEESSENS contre la BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    Recalling that to exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention the person concerned must have raised before the national authorities, at least in substance, the complaint he puts before the Commission (cf. No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63), the Commission finds that it is therefore not competent to deal with this aspect of the applicant's complaint.
  • EKMR, 04.07.1984 - 10689/83

    ALTMANN (Barbie) c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    The Commission recalls that it is primarily the task of national authorities to apply and interpret domestic law, but that the Convention organs have a limited jurisdiction to control the manner in which it is done (cf. No. 10689/83, Dec. 14.5.84, D.R. 37 p. 225).
  • EKMR, 04.12.1978 - 8239/78

    X. v. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251).
  • EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 8278/78

    X. v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251).
  • EKMR, 15.05.1980 - 8317/78

    McFEELEY et al. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45).
  • EKMR, 10.12.1984 - 10435/83

    ACMANNE and others v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    In respect of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention the Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (cf. No. 8239/78, Dec. 4.12.1978, D.R. 16 p. 184; No. 8278/78, Dec. 13.12.1979, D.R. 18 p. 154 and No. 10435/83, Dec. 10.12.1984, D.R. 40 p. 251).
  • EKMR, 03.12.1986 - 10491/83

    ANGELENI v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    In respect of the applicant's complaints that urine samples taken in prison are not properly sealed and that there are no rules as to whether or not these samples should be kept and how a countercheck could be carried out, the Commission recalls that it only examines the personal situation of the applicant and not the general scope of the laws applied to him (cf. No.10491/83, Dec. 3.12.86, D.R. 51 p. 41).
  • EKMR, 08.10.1982 - 9054/80

    A. v. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
    The "prevention of disorder or crime", for example, may justify wider measures of interference in the case of such a prisoner than in that of a person at liberty (cf. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.1980, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 91 and No. 9054/80, Dec. of 8.10.1982, D.R. 30, p. 113; and, mutatis mutandis, Eur.Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21.2.1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, para. 45).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 58481/18

    LENOIR RIZZO c. FRANCE

    La requête ne pose pas, selon lui, une question de principe qui serait nouvelle, qu'il s'agisse du consentement du patient (décisions de la Commission dans les affaires X. c. Autriche, no 8278/78, 13 décembre 1979, Acmanne et autres c. Belgique, no 10435/83, 10 décembre 1984 et Peters c. Pays-Bas, no 21132/93, 6 avril 1994) ou de la confidentialité des données médicales (Z c. Finlande, 25 février 1997, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-I).
  • EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 29033/95

    SANDRÉN v. SWEDEN

    The Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (see, e.g., No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 75, 79).
  • EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 25708/94

    R.G. v. THE NETHERLANDS

    The Commission recalls that, in order to exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, an applicant must have raised before the national courts, either in form or in substance, the complaints submitted to the Commission (cf. No. 11425/85, Dec. 5.10.87, D.R. 53 p. 76, and No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77 p. 75).
  • EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 29034/95

    CIESLAR v. SWEDEN

    The Commission recalls that a compulsory medical intervention, even if it is of minor importance, must be considered an interference with the right to respect for private life (see, e.g., No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 75, 79).
  • EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36986/97

    DU BOIS v. THE NETHERLANDS

    As regards the applicant's assertion that the Netherlands Supreme Court incorrectly interprets the notion of "material evidence" in that this term should also include all methods of investigation, the Commission recalls that it only examines the personal situation of an applicant and not the general scope of the laws applicable to him (No. 21132/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77, p. 75).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht