Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 22606/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,27520) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86
KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 22606/93
If the accused is represented by counsel, neither paragraph 1 nor 3 (c) of Article 6 (Art. 6-1, 6-3-c) require his presence at such proceedings (Eur. Court H.R., Kremzow judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-B, p. 44, para. 63). - EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79
Bönisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 22606/93
In the circumstances of the present case, it will consider the applicant's complaints from the angle of paragraph 1 taken together with the principles inherent in paragraph 3 (Art. 6-3)(see Eur. Court H.R., Bönisch judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, p. 15, para. 29; Unterpertinger judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, para. 29). - EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 22606/93
In the circumstances of the present case, it will consider the applicant's complaints from the angle of paragraph 1 taken together with the principles inherent in paragraph 3 (Art. 6-3)(see Eur. Court H.R., Bönisch judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, p. 15, para. 29; Unterpertinger judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, para. 29).