Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,25544) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
It is in principle within the discretionary power of domestic courts to establish whether the hearing of witnesses is likely to be of assistance for discovering the truth and, if not, to refuse the calling of such witnesses (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 5; No. 10486/83, Dec. 9.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 86; and Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89). - EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
1, the Commission will consider the complaint under the two provisions taken together (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 25). - EKMR, 06.03.1982 - 8231/78
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
It is in principle within the discretionary power of domestic courts to establish whether the hearing of witnesses is likely to be of assistance for discovering the truth and, if not, to refuse the calling of such witnesses (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 5; No. 10486/83, Dec. 9.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 86; and Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89). - EKMR, 04.07.1979 - 8414/78
X. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
Where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the declarations of the witness involved (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.79, D.R. 17 p. 231). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
It is in principle within the discretionary power of domestic courts to establish whether the hearing of witnesses is likely to be of assistance for discovering the truth and, if not, to refuse the calling of such witnesses (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 5; No. 10486/83, Dec. 9.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 86; and Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).