Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 06.07.1998 - 18781/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,23797) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GASPER v. SWEDEN
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GASPER c. SUEDE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77
CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.07.1998 - 18781/91
In determining whether a body can be considered to be an "independent" tribunal, i.e. in particular independent of the executive and of the parties to the case, regard must be had to the manner of appointment of its members and the duration of their term of office, the existence of regulations governing their removal or guarantees for their irremovability, laws prohibiting their being given instructions by the executive in their adjudicatory role, the existence of legal guarantees against outside pressures, the question whether the body presents an appearance of independence and the attendance of members of the judiciary in the proceedings (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp. 39-41, paras. 78-81). - EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.07.1998 - 18781/91
What is decisive is whether this fear can be held objectively justified (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Hauschildt v. Denmark judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, paras. 46- 48). - EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85
HELMERS c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.07.1998 - 18781/91
The main question is whether a departure from the principle that there should be a public hearing could, in the circumstances of the case, be justified at the appeal stage by the special features of the domestic proceedings as a whole (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 15, paras. 31-32).