Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,26066) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
K.L. v. FINLAND
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 1, A... rt. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4, Art. 57, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90
DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93
An exception could only be made where the Commission considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols, for instance in that a judgment has no legal justification and thereby violates a party's right to receive a fair trial (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Moor judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 18, para. 55; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93
The Commission furthermore recalls that Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention does not apply to the leave to appeal proceedings as such before the Finnish Supreme Court (e.g., No. 19823/92, Dec. 9.2.93, unpublished). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93
1 (Art. 6-1), the Commission has examined the application from the point of view of these two provisions taken together (e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Lüdi judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43). - EKMR, 11.05.1984 - 10039/82
LEIGH, GUARDIAN NEWSPAPERS Ltd., THE OBSERVER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93
It can furthermore be regarded as "necessary in a democratic society... for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary" (cf., mutatis mutandis, No. 10039/82, Dec. 11.5.84, D.R. 38 p. 74). - EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77
COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21581/93
An exception could only be made where the Commission considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols, for instance in that a judgment has no legal justification and thereby violates a party's right to receive a fair trial (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Moor judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 18, para. 55; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).