Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1988,16064
EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,16064)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 07.03.1988 - 11701/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,16064)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 07. März 1988 - 11701/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,16064)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,16064) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EKMR, 15.05.1980 - 8317/78

    McFEELEY et al. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    Under Article 3 (Art. 3), the Commission has previously been confronted with a number of cases of prison conditions, including isolation of varying duration and severity (cf. inter alia No. 6038/73, Dec. 11.7.73, Collection 44 p. 115; No. 7854/77, Dec. 12.7.78, D.R. 12 p. 185; No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 44).

    It has moreover drawn a distinction between this and removal from association with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons, and would not normally consider that this form of segregation from the prison community amounts to inhuman treatment or punishment (cf. No. 5310/71, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Rep. 25.1.76, p. 379; Nos. 7572/76, 7586/76 and 7587/76, Dec. 8.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 64 and No. 8317/78 mentioned above).

  • EGMR, 18.01.1978 - 5310/71

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    It has moreover drawn a distinction between this and removal from association with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons, and would not normally consider that this form of segregation from the prison community amounts to inhuman treatment or punishment (cf. No. 5310/71, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Rep. 25.1.76, p. 379; Nos. 7572/76, 7586/76 and 7587/76, Dec. 8.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 64 and No. 8317/78 mentioned above).
  • EKMR, 08.07.1978 - 7572/76

    ENSSLIN, BAADER and RASPE v. GERMANY

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    It has moreover drawn a distinction between this and removal from association with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons, and would not normally consider that this form of segregation from the prison community amounts to inhuman treatment or punishment (cf. No. 5310/71, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Rep. 25.1.76, p. 379; Nos. 7572/76, 7586/76 and 7587/76, Dec. 8.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 64 and No. 8317/78 mentioned above).
  • EKMR, 12.07.1978 - 7854/77

    BONZI c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    Under Article 3 (Art. 3), the Commission has previously been confronted with a number of cases of prison conditions, including isolation of varying duration and severity (cf. inter alia No. 6038/73, Dec. 11.7.73, Collection 44 p. 115; No. 7854/77, Dec. 12.7.78, D.R. 12 p. 185; No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 44).
  • EKMR, 11.07.1973 - 6038/73

    X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    Under Article 3 (Art. 3), the Commission has previously been confronted with a number of cases of prison conditions, including isolation of varying duration and severity (cf. inter alia No. 6038/73, Dec. 11.7.73, Collection 44 p. 115; No. 7854/77, Dec. 12.7.78, D.R. 12 p. 185; No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 44).
  • EKMR, 09.07.1981 - 8463/78

    KRÖCHER AND MÖLLER v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1988 - 11701/85
    In making an assessment in the present case, it follows that regard must be had to the surrounding circumstances including the particular conditions, the stringency of the measure, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (cf. also No. 8463/78, Dec. 16.12.82, D.R. 26 p. 24).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht