Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HEMPFING c. ALLEMAGNE

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HEMPFING v. GERMANY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 1992, 963

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• BVerfG, 14.07.1987 - 1 BvR 537/81

  Standesrichtlinien

  Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1991 - 14622/89

  Until enactment of rules of professional conduct in bye-laws, only a minimum of professional duties indispensable for the proper functioning of the administration of justice persisted (see 1 BvR 537/81, 11951/87, Entscheidungssammlung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfGE) Vol. 76, p. 171).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1991 - 14622/89

  The interpretation and application of such legislation are inevitably questions of practice (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, para. 30 with further references).
• EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

  Barthold ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1991 - 14622/89

  The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but this goes hand in hand with a European supervision which is more or less extensive depending upon the circumstances (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 24-25, para. 55; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment, op. cit., pp. 19-20, para. 33).
• EuGH - 162/79 (anhängig)

  Baranzini / Kommission

  Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1991 - 14622/89

  Thus the core of the prohibition on advertisement, i.e. advertisement directly aimed at practice, or on misleading advertisement, always undisputedly formed part of the duties of any liberal profession (Federal Constitutional Court's decision of 14 July 1987, 12 BvR 162/79; BVerfGE 76, p. 196).

• EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96

  WINTER v. GERMANY

  In the present case, the requirement of objectivity and the duty to refrain from insult and defamation formed part of the essence of professional duties, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the disciplinary courts and the Federal Constitutional Court (cf. No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, D.R. 69 p. 272).

  The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (cf. Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.).

• EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 25157/94

  MEISTER v. GERMANY

  In the present case, the requirement of objectivity and the duty to refrain from insult and defamation formed part of the essence of professional duties, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the disciplinary courts and the Federal Constitutional Court (cf. No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, D.R. 69, p. 272).

  The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (Eur. Court H.R., Observer and Guardian judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.).

• EKMR, 10.04.1997 - 30549/96

  MEISTER v. GERMANY

  In the present case, the requirement of objectivity and the duty to refrain from insult and defamation formed part of the essence of professional duties, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the disciplinary courts and the Federal Constitutional Court (cf. No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, D.R. 69, p. 272).

  The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (cf. Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.).

• EKMR, 15.04.1997 - 30339/96

  BOSSI v. GERMANY

  The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (cf. Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.).