Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  P. ET P. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 15.12.1988 - 10802/84
• EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84
• EGMR, 25.02.1992 - 10802/84

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  As regards the participation of two judges in the first applicant's trial who had earlier acted as investigating judges, the Commission recalls that such participation may raise an issue concerning the impartiality of the court (cf. in particular Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86; No. 9976/82, Ben Yaacoub v. Belgium, Comm. Report 7.5.86; and e contrario, No. 10486/83, Hauschildt v. Denmark, Comm. Report 16.7.87).

  Having regard to the Court's De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984 (Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 86), it finds that these complaints raise complex issues of fact and law regarding the application of Article 6 para.

• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  In this respect the Commission recalls that a person may validly waive invoking the guarantees under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (cf. No. 1197/61, Dec. 5.3.62, Collection 8 pp. 68, 73; No. 6903/75, Deweer v. Belgium, Comm. Report 5.10.78, paras. 55 et seq., confirmed by Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 25, paras. 49 et seq.; No. 9177/80, Dec. 6.10.81., D.R. 26 pp. 255, 258).
• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222/236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).

 
• EKMR, 05.03.1962 - 1197/61

  X. contre la REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  In this respect the Commission recalls that a person may validly waive invoking the guarantees under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (cf. No. 1197/61, Dec. 5.3.62, Collection 8 pp. 68, 73; No. 6903/75, Deweer v. Belgium, Comm. Report 5.10.78, paras. 55 et seq., confirmed by Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 25, paras. 49 et seq.; No. 9177/80, Dec. 6.10.81., D.R. 26 pp. 255, 258).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  Having regard to the Court's Silver and Others judgment of 25 March 1983 (Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 61) it finds that these complaints raise complex issues of fact and law regarding the application of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention which require a determination on the merits.
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222/236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• EKMR, 06.10.1981 - 9177/80

  X. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  In this respect the Commission recalls that a person may validly waive invoking the guarantees under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (cf. No. 1197/61, Dec. 5.3.62, Collection 8 pp. 68, 73; No. 6903/75, Deweer v. Belgium, Comm. Report 5.10.78, paras. 55 et seq., confirmed by Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 25, paras. 49 et seq.; No. 9177/80, Dec. 6.10.81., D.R. 26 pp. 255, 258).
• EGMR, 27.11.1987 - 9976/82

  BEN YAACOUB v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  As regards the participation of two judges in the first applicant's trial who had earlier acted as investigating judges, the Commission recalls that such participation may raise an issue concerning the impartiality of the court (cf. in particular Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86; No. 9976/82, Ben Yaacoub v. Belgium, Comm. Report 7.5.86; and e contrario, No. 10486/83, Hauschildt v. Denmark, Comm. Report 16.7.87).
• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 10802/84

  As regards the participation of two judges in the first applicant's trial who had earlier acted as investigating judges, the Commission recalls that such participation may raise an issue concerning the impartiality of the court (cf. in particular Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86; No. 9976/82, Ben Yaacoub v. Belgium, Comm. Report 7.5.86; and e contrario, No. 10486/83, Hauschildt v. Denmark, Comm. Report 16.7.87).