Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAUGER c. AUTRICHE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 27, Art. 27 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partiellement recevable Partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAUGER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 27, Art. 27 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90
• EKMR, 27.02.1996 - 16717/90
• EGMR, 28.05.1997 - 16717/90

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EKMR, 12.10.1992 - 16358/90

  CERECEDA MARTÍN ET AUTRES contre l'ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  In considering this issue, the Commission needs to verify whether the applications to the different institutions have substantially the same content (cf. No. 17512/90, Dec. 30.6.92 and 6.7.92, and No. 16358/90, Dec. 12.10.92, D.R. 73).
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  In this respect the Commission recalls that the principle of equality of arms is only one feature of a wider notion of a fair hearing and implies that each party shall have a reasonable opportunity of presenting his case to the court under conditions which do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Eur. Court H.R., Dombo Beheer B.V. judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, para. 33).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

  FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention since it could have reviewed the correct application of the Austrian Pensions Act to the applicant's case (see Eur. Court H.R., Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 13-14, paras. 31-32; No. 16922/90, Fischer v. Austria, Comm. Report 9.9.93, paras. 43-46).

 
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  The Commission recalls that for the purpose of complying with Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, only such remedies are to be taken into account as offer the possibility of an effective redress of the alleged violation of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Van Oosterwijck judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 13, para. 27).
• EKMR, 09.12.1986 - 10938/84

  KAUFMAN contre la BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention that the reasons given by a court should deal specifically with all points which may have been considered by one party to be essential to his case; a party does not have an absolute right to require reasons to be given for rejecting each of his arguments (No. 10938/84, Dec. 9.12.86, D.R. 50 p. 98).
• EKMR, 06.07.1992 - 17512/90

  CALCERRADA FORNIELES ET CABEZA MATO contre l'ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  In considering this issue, the Commission needs to verify whether the applications to the different institutions have substantially the same content (cf. No. 17512/90, Dec. 30.6.92 and 6.7.92, and No. 16358/90, Dec. 12.10.92, D.R. 73).
• EKMR, 09.03.1989 - 11763/85

  BANER c. SUEDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  1 (Art. 6-1) neither guarantees a specific result of the proceedings in question, nor guarantees a right of access to a court with competence to invalidate or override a law (No. 11763/85, Dec. 9.3.89, D.R. 60 p. 128).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

  ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 16717/90

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention since it could have reviewed the correct application of the Austrian Pensions Act to the applicant's case (see Eur. Court H.R., Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 13-14, paras. 31-32; No. 16922/90, Fischer v. Austria, Comm. Report 9.9.93, paras. 43-46).

• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  Premièrement, pour qu'une requête soit considérée comme « essentiellement la même " qu'une requête précédente, il faut qu'elles se rapportent toutes deux à des parties, des griefs et des faits identiques (Verein Gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT), précité, § 63, et Pauger c. Autriche (déc.), nos 16717/90 et 24872/94, décision de la Commission du 9 janvier 1995).