Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,24881) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93
- EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19092/91
YAGIZ c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93
The Commission also considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant was not required to pursue any legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, to be published in D.R.75). - EuGH, 28.05.1975 - 44/75
Könecke / Kommission
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93
These included 6 journalists from the Özgür Gündem: Musa Anter killed in 1992; Hafiz Akdemir who was shot on 8 June 1992 in Diyarbakir, Yahya Orhan who was shot and killed in the street in Gerçus near Batman on 31 July 1992, Hüseyin Deniz shot on 9 August 1992 in Ceylanpinar and died from injuries, Kemal Kiliç killed on 18 February 1993 and Ferhat Tepe, kidnapped by persons unknown and his body found on 3 August 1993 (Helsinki Watch "Free Expression in Turkey 1993: Killings, Convictions, Confiscations", August 1993, Vol. 5 Issue 17 and see also Amnesty International report "Turkey: walls of glass" November 1992, AI Index Eur 44/75/92). - EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93
It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262). - EKMR, 11.05.1989 - 14116/88
SARGIN ; YAGCI contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93
It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262).