Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 23773/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,27997) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BACK v. FINLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 23773/94
The burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient remedies lies upon the State (Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 15, para. 26). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 23773/94
An applicant must make normal use of remedies likely to be effective and adequate in respect of the matters of which he complains (cf., e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 30, para. 66). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 23773/94
The Commission therefore considers that the applicant was not, for the reasons referred to by him, absolved from the requirement to challenge the allegedly deficient reasons for the activity prohibition at least in substance in the proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court (cf., e.g., Cardot judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, pp. 18-19, paras. 34-36; No. 11244/87, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55 pp. 98; No. 11921/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 57 p. 81).
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06
ANASTASSAKOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Nonetheless, the Court has already accepted that the mere existence of doubts as to the effectiveness of a domestic remedy does not automatically absolve the applicant from the obligation to use it (see, inter alia, Back v. Finland (dec.), no. 23773/94, 9 April 1996, and Tamm v. Estonia (dec.), no. 15301/04, 2 September 2008).