Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 28778/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,31262) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KIGHTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 19, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EKMR, 05.04.1994 - 21283/93
TYLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 28778/95
In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of fact or law have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (cf., for example, No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77, p. 81). - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 28778/95
Moreover, this paragraph must be construed in the light of the principle laid down in the Article's first sentence (cf. Eur. Cour HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17, para. 48). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 28778/95
The concern to achieve this balance is reflected in the structure of Article 1 (Art. 1) as a whole, including the second paragraph: there must therefore be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim pursued (cf. Eur. Court HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, pp. 26 and 28, paras. 69 and 73).
- EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 30291/96
GODNEY, WRIGHT AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
For the rest, the Government rely upon the Commission's reasoning in the relevant part of the Kightley case (No. 28778/95, Dec. 7.4.97, unpublished).