Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 37588/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,33655) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ASPLUND v. SWEDEN
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 37588/97
It may be sufficient that administrative or professional bodies determine the dispute at first instance, provided that their decisions are subject to a subsequent review by a judicial procedure which satisfies the conditions of Article 6 (cf. Eur. Court HR, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 22, para. 51, and Özturk v. Germany judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 21, para. 56). - EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 25096/94
REMER v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 37588/97
The Commission recalls that, as a general rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them, as well as the relevance of the evidence a party in a case seeks to adduce (No. 25096/94, Dec. 6.9.95, D.R. 82, p. 117). - EKMR, 03.12.1996 - 24949/94
KONTTINEN c. FINLANDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 37588/97
As regards the applicant's complaint that the Court of Appeal failed to give reasons for its decision, the Commission acknowledges that the absence of reasons in a court decision might raise an issue as to the fairness of the proceedings (cf. No. 24949/94, Dec. 3.12.96, D.R. 87-A, p. 68). - EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 37588/97
It may be sufficient that administrative or professional bodies determine the dispute at first instance, provided that their decisions are subject to a subsequent review by a judicial procedure which satisfies the conditions of Article 6 (cf. Eur. Court HR, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 22, para. 51, and Özturk v. Germany judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 21, para. 56).