Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  P.K., M.K. AND B.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.12.1992 - 19085/91

  In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual (see eg. Eur. court H.R. Abdulaziz judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94 p. para. 67 and the B. v France judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 232-C para. 44).
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.12.1992 - 19085/91

  Although the essential object of Article 8 (Art. 8) is to protect the individual against arbitrary interference by public authorities, there may in addition be positive obligations inherent in an effective "respect" for family life (see eg. Eur. Court H.R., Marckx judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31 p. 31 para. 31).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.12.1992 - 19085/91

  It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of the available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 15, para. 26, Application No. 9013/80, Dec. 11.12.82, D.R. 30, p. 96, p. 102).
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13343/87

  B. c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.12.1992 - 19085/91

  In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual (see eg. Eur. court H.R. Abdulaziz judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94 p. para. 67 and the B. v France judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 232-C para. 44).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.12.1992 - 19085/91

  It only applies if the individual can be said to have an "arguable claim" of a violation of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52).

• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 19200/91

  KINSELLA AND MULVANEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (See Nos. 18632/91, Dec. 9.12.92, and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).

  The applicant is apparently detained as a Category A prisoner and any transfer would arguably be highly dangerous, increasing the risk of escape (see also Nos. 18632/91 and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92).

• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 19785/92

  McCOMBE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (See Nos. 18632/91, Dec. 9.12.92, and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).

  The applicant is apparently detained as a Category A prisoner and any transfer would arguably be highly dangerous, increasing the risk of escape (see also Nos. 18632/91 and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92).

• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 21596/93

  DOWD AND McKENNA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (See Nos. 18632/91, Dec. 9.12.92, and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).

  Any transfer therefore would arguably be highly dangerous, increasing the risk of escape (see also Nos. 18632/91 and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92).

 
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 19786/92

  HOLMES, McGEOUGH AND HOLMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (See Nos. 18632/91, Dec. 9.12.92, and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).

  The applicant is detained as a Category A prisoner and any transfer would arguably be highly dangerous, increasing the risk of escape (see also Nos. 18632/91 and 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92).

• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20482/92

  VELLA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (No. 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20483/92

  ARMSTRONG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (No. 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20484/92

  McLAUGHLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (No. 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20487/92

  O'DWYER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (No. 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20486/92

  GIBSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  (No. 19085/91, Dec. 9.12.92, to be published in D.R.).
• EKMR, 12.09.1997 - 24889/94

  McCULLOUGH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  They argue that a wider, more modern approach to family life should be adopted and refer to Republican prisoners transfer cases which emphasised the importance of maintaining family links (see eg. 19085/91 Kavanagh v. the United Kingdom, dec. 9.12.92).