Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25907/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,29568) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SJÖBERG-THÖRN v. SWEDEN
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25907/94
It may be sufficient that administrative or professional bodies determine the dispute at first instance, provided that their decisions are subject to review thereafter by a judicial procedure which satisfies the conditions of Article 6 (Art. 6) (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 22, para. 51). - EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86
ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25907/94
The Commission has found no evidence in this case which could lead to the conclusion that in examining the applicant's complaints regarding the alleged procedural errors, unlawfulness and disregard of fundamental legal principles the Supreme Administrative Court had to decline jurisdiction in ruling on them or in ascertaining the relevant facts (cf., Eur. Court H.R., Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 13-14, paras. 31-32). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25907/94
Furthermore, a difference of treatment is discriminatory only if it "has no objective and reasonable justification" and the Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment in law (see Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 102, p. 66, para. 177). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25907/94
On the other hand, it has no independent existence since it has effect solely in relation to "the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms safeguarded by the other substantive provisions" (see Eur. Court H.R., Van der Mussele judgment of 29 September 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 22, para. 43).