Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 11.12.1991 - 18631/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,18437) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZATUNDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.12.1991 - 18631/91
However, according to the constant case-law of the Convention organs, "Article 13 (Art. 13) cannot reasonably be interpreted so as to require a remedy in domestic law in respect of any supposed grievance under the Convention that an individual may have, no matter how unmeritorious his complaint may be: the grievance must be an arguable one in terms of the Convention" (Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23 para. 52). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.12.1991 - 18631/91
He invoked Article 3 of the Convention and relied on, inter alia, the Soering and Vilvarajah and Others cases (Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, and Nos. 13163/87, 13164/87, 13165/87, 13447/87 and 13448/87, Vilvarajah, Skandarajah, Sivakumaran, Navratnasingam and Rasalingam v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Report 8.5.90). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.12.1991 - 18631/91
The Commission recalls the constant case-law of the Convention organs "that expulsion by a Contracting State of an asylum seeker may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3), and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned faced a real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the country to which he was returned" (Eur. Court H.R., Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, para. 103, to be published in Series A no. 215).