Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1991,16139
EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88 (https://dejure.org/1991,16139)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 12.01.1991 - 14401/88 (https://dejure.org/1991,16139)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Januar 1991 - 14401/88 (https://dejure.org/1991,16139)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,16139) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EKMR, 02.02.1970 - 4314/69

    X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
    The Commission recalls that the mere fact that the applicants feared that, upon their return to Iran, they would be obliged to perform military service cannot as such raise an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) or any other provision of the Convention (see No. 4314/69, Dec. 2.2.70, Collection 32 p. 97).
  • EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 12102/86

    Y-N. et consorts contre la SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
    However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, which prohibits inhuman treatment (see No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286 ; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
    Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention only enshrines the right to an effective remedy in domestic law in respect of a grievance which must be an "arguable one" in terms of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52; Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, para. 33).
  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

    Jens Söring

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
    However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, which prohibits inhuman treatment (see No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286 ; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

    POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
    Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention only enshrines the right to an effective remedy in domestic law in respect of a grievance which must be an "arguable one" in terms of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52; Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, para. 33).
  • EKMR, 14.10.1991 - 16381/90

    R. v. DENMARK

    However, the Commission recalls that the mere fact that an applicant would be obliged to perform military service cannot as such raise an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) or any other provision of the Convention and this conclusion is not changed by the fact that military service might be prolonged (see No. 4314/69, Dec. 2.2.70, Collection 32 p. 97 and No. 14401/88, Dec. 12.1.91, to be published in D.R.).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht