Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,16139) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A. AND K.B.F. v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A. ET K.B.F. c. TURQUIE
Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EKMR, 02.02.1970 - 4314/69
X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
The Commission recalls that the mere fact that the applicants feared that, upon their return to Iran, they would be obliged to perform military service cannot as such raise an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) or any other provision of the Convention (see No. 4314/69, Dec. 2.2.70, Collection 32 p. 97). - EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 12102/86
Y-N. et consorts contre la SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, which prohibits inhuman treatment (see No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286 ; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention only enshrines the right to an effective remedy in domestic law in respect of a grievance which must be an "arguable one" in terms of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52; Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, para. 33). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, which prohibits inhuman treatment (see No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286 ; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention only enshrines the right to an effective remedy in domestic law in respect of a grievance which must be an "arguable one" in terms of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52; Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, para. 33).
- EKMR, 14.10.1991 - 16381/90
R. v. DENMARK
However, the Commission recalls that the mere fact that an applicant would be obliged to perform military service cannot as such raise an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) or any other provision of the Convention and this conclusion is not changed by the fact that military service might be prolonged (see No. 4314/69, Dec. 2.2.70, Collection 32 p. 97 and No. 14401/88, Dec. 12.1.91, to be published in D.R.).