Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23898/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,28525) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84
BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23898/94
However, "necessity" implies that the interference must correspond to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it must be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Berrehab judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, p. 15, para. 26). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23898/94
It is true that a person against whom an extradition procedure is pending can claim to be a victim of an alleged violation of Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned, if extradited, faces a real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the requesting country (Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 35 para 91).