Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,29065) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIDDLETON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14191/88
HOLM v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94
Furthermore, these principles apply equally to each juror as the sole arbiters of fact (Eur. Court H.R., Holm judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-A, p. 14, para. 30 and, mutatis mutandis, No. 19874/92, Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, Comm. Report 2.3.95, unpublished).In such circumstances, additional importance would therefore attach to ensuring that the impartiality of the jury is, "by other means", objectively guaranteed (No. 14191/88, Holm v. Sweden, Comm. Report 13.10.92, Series A no. 279-A, p. 26, para. 64 and No. 22399/93, Pullar v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Report 11.1.95, p. 7 para. 39).
- EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94
The Commission recalls that, as regards complaints about lawyers for whom the applicant has received legal aid, the responsibility of the State can only be engaged in relation to that lawyer's actions to the extent that the applicant is not provided with effective assistance by that lawyer (Eur. Court H.R., Artico judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, para. 33). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94
As regards the applicant's complaint concerning jury prejudice, the Commission recalls that, according to the constant case-law of the Convention organs, the existence of impartiality must be determined according to a subjective test namely, on the basis of a personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case - personal impartiality being assumed until there is proof to the contrary (see, for example, Eur. Court H.R., Padovani judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, paras. 25-26). - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 8273/78
Axen ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94
3 (c) (Art. 6-3-c) of the Convention, his legal aid application and appeal having been determined pursuant to the 1975 Act (mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court H.R., Axen judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 11, para. 24). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23934/94
Even appearances may be important; what is at stake is the confidence which the court must inspire in the accused in criminal proceedings and what is decisive is whether the applicant's fear as to a lack of impartiality can be regarded as objectively justifiable (Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 14, para. 26 and Padovani judgment, loc. cit., p. 20, paras. 25 and 27).