Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,26462) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUSA v. AUSTRIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89
CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50 p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103).Since the nature of the contracting States' responsibility under Article 3 (Art. 3) in cases of this kind lies in the act of exposing an individual to the risk of ill-treatment, the existence of the risk must be assessed primarily with reference to those facts which were known or ought to have been known to the Contracting State at the time of the expulsion (Eur. Court H.R., Cruz-Varas and Others judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 30, para. 76).
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44
The Commission recalls that Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention requires a remedy in domestic law only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 14, para. 31). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50 p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103). - EKMR, 16.10.1986 - 12122/86
L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50 p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103).