Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,24449) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PANVERT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EKMR, 07.05.1987 - 11723/85
CHATER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95
The Commission recalls that the Convention organs have found on several occasions that Contracting States enjoy a wide discretion in regulating planning matters (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, para. 69, and, in the context of United Kingdom legislation, Chater v. the United Kingdom, No. 11723/85, Dec. 7.5.87, D.R. 52 p. 250, 256).The Commission must determine whether, whilst recognising the wide margin of appreciation afforded to States in planning matters, a fair balance was struck between the general interest of the community and the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (cf. Chater v. the United Kingdom, No. 11723/85, referred to above).
- EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84
ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95
Accordingly, the Commission must supervise the lawfulness, purpose and proportionality of the restrictions (cf, for example, Eur. Court H.R., Allan Jacobsson judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, pp. 17 -18, paras. 56-64). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95
The Commission recalls that the Convention organs have found on several occasions that Contracting States enjoy a wide discretion in regulating planning matters (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, para. 69, and, in the context of United Kingdom legislation, Chater v. the United Kingdom, No. 11723/85, Dec. 7.5.87, D.R. 52 p. 250, 256). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95
These comments could be interpreted as the Court of Appeal declining jurisdiction in respect of a particular point (cf., Eur. Court H.R., Fischer judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 18, para. 34). - EGMR, 22.11.1995 - 20166/92
S.W. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 26889/95
The Commission first notes that the proceedings in the present case involved the determination of the applicant's "civil rights" (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Bryan judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335, para. 31 "Bryan judgment").