Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 12.07.1988 - 11518/85 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,18826) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76
YOUNG, JAMES ET WEBSTER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.07.1988 - 11518/85
In marked contrast to the position of the applicants in the case of Young, James and Webster (Eur. Court H.R., judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44) the union membership, or closed shop, agreement within the Ford Motor Company was in full effect at the time when the applicant joined that firm.The Government contend, with reference to the case of Young, James and Webster (Eur. Court H.R., judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44), that Article 11 (Art. 11) does not guarantee a general negative freedom not to belong to a trade union.
- EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.07.1988 - 11518/85
A search for this balance is inherent in the whole of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 22 September 1980, Series A no. 52, para. 69). - EKMR, 14.05.1980 - 8378/78
KAMAL c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.07.1988 - 11518/85
In reviewing the decisions of the Industrial Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal the Commission should limit itself to the question whether such a determination was unfair, perverse, arbitrary or otherwise a denial of the applicants rights (see, mutatis mutandis, No 8378/78, Dec of 14.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 168).