Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZUKRIGL v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

  JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.05.1992 - 17279/90

  The Commission has had regard to the jurisprudence of the Court according to which the very existence of legislation may continuously affect the exercise of a right under the Convention (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41) even in the absence of an individual measure of implementation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Johnston and Others judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 112, p. 21, para. 42) and even where the risk of such an implementation is minimal (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 16, para. 33).
• EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

  NORRIS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.05.1992 - 17279/90

  The Commission has had regard to the jurisprudence of the Court according to which the very existence of legislation may continuously affect the exercise of a right under the Convention (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41) even in the absence of an individual measure of implementation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Johnston and Others judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 112, p. 21, para. 42) and even where the risk of such an implementation is minimal (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 16, para. 33).
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.05.1992 - 17279/90

  "Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention entitles individuals to contend that a law violates their rights by itself, in the absence of an individual measure of implementation, if they run the risk of being directly affected by it." (Eur. Court H.R., Marckx judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 13, para. 27).
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.05.1992 - 17279/90

  The Commission has had regard to the jurisprudence of the Court according to which the very existence of legislation may continuously affect the exercise of a right under the Convention (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41) even in the absence of an individual measure of implementation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Johnston and Others judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 112, p. 21, para. 42) and even where the risk of such an implementation is minimal (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 16, para. 33).

• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 39392/98

  G.L. AND A.V. v. AUSTRIA

  This judgment was given upon the complaint of a person, who subsequently brought his case before the Commission (no. 17279/90, Z. v. Austria decision 13.5.92, unpublished).

  They refer to the case-law of the Commission (cf. no. 17279/90 Z. v. Austria, decision 13.5.92, unpublished, and no. 22646/93, H.F. v. Austria, decision 26.6.95, unpublished) pointing out that it found no indication of a violation either of Article 8 alone or taken in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention in respect of section 209 of the Austrian Criminal Code.