Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,22648) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GEYER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
1 (Art. 6-1) does not demand that the first of these satisfythe requirements of that provision (Eur. Court H.R., Le Compte, VanLeuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 22et seq., para. 51; No. 11179/84, Dec. 9.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 207 at 223). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
The Commission recalls that the right to a fair hearing impliesthat the applicant be able to present her case under conditions whichdo not place her under a substantial disadvantage vis-a-vis heropponent (No. 9938/82, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 21). - EKMR, 06.05.1986 - 10474/83
VEIT c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
The Commission, having regard to its case-law, finds that thepecuniary nature of the claim allows that claim to be consideredtransferable (No. 10474/83, Dec. 6.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 106).
- EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84
ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
The Commission further recalls that the civil character of theright at issue is not to be interpreted solely by reference to therespondent state's domestic law and that it is enough that the outcomeof the proceedings should be decisive for private rights andobligations (Eur. Court H.R., Allan Jacobsson judgment of 25 October1989, Series A no. 163, p. 20, para. 72). - EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10930/84
BODÉN v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
Furthermore, the proceedings concerned a genuine and seriousdispute ("contestation") over the return of ownership over previouslyexpropriated land; hence, the dispute related to the actual existenceof a "right" (see Eur. Court H.R., Bodén judgment of 27 October 1987,Series A no. 125-B, pp. 39 et seq., paras. 28 et seq.; Firma F.M.Zumtobel and Martin Zumtobel v. Austria, Comm. Report 30.6.92, paras.56 et seq.). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
Article 6 (Art. 6) does not in itself guarantee anyparticular content for "rights and obligations" in the substantive lawof the Contracting States (see Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow and othersjudgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 70, para. 192). - EGMR, 22.06.1989 - 11179/84
LANGBORGER v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 16789/90
1 (Art. 6-1) does not demand that the first of these satisfythe requirements of that provision (Eur. Court H.R., Le Compte, VanLeuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 22et seq., para. 51; No. 11179/84, Dec. 9.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 207 at 223).