Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAUER AND GUGGENHEIM v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  The Constitutional Court found that Article 11 of the Convention obliged the State authorities to protect lawful assemblies (with reference to Eur. Court H.R., Plattform 'Ärzte für das Leben' judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139).

  1 (1) of the Administrative Proceedings (Introduction) Act, and referred to the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in its Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" judgment, according to which public authorities are obliged to take positive action and protect an assembly (Eur. Court H.R., Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139).

• EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13308/87

  CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  1 (Art. 10-1) must have some basis in domestic law, which itself must be accessible to the person concerned and be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the individual to foresee its consequences for him (Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 21, para. 45; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, para. 29; mutatis mutandis, Kruslin judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 27; Huvig judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 26; Chorherr judgment of 25 August 1993, para. 26, to be published in Series A no. 266-B).
• EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

  Barthold ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  1 (Art. 10-1) must have some basis in domestic law, which itself must be accessible to the person concerned and be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the individual to foresee its consequences for him (Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 21, para. 45; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, para. 29; mutatis mutandis, Kruslin judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 27; Huvig judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 26; Chorherr judgment of 25 August 1993, para. 26, to be published in Series A no. 266-B).

 
• EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

  MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  1 (Art. 10-1) must have some basis in domestic law, which itself must be accessible to the person concerned and be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the individual to foresee its consequences for him (Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 21, para. 45; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, para. 29; mutatis mutandis, Kruslin judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 27; Huvig judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 26; Chorherr judgment of 25 August 1993, para. 26, to be published in Series A no. 266-B).
• EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

  KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  1 (Art. 10-1) must have some basis in domestic law, which itself must be accessible to the person concerned and be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the individual to foresee its consequences for him (Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 21, para. 45; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, para. 29; mutatis mutandis, Kruslin judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 27; Huvig judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 26; Chorherr judgment of 25 August 1993, para. 26, to be published in Series A no. 266-B).
• EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11105/84

  HUVIG c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18116/91

  1 (Art. 10-1) must have some basis in domestic law, which itself must be accessible to the person concerned and be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the individual to foresee its consequences for him (Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 21, para. 45; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, para. 29; mutatis mutandis, Kruslin judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 27; Huvig judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 26; Chorherr judgment of 25 August 1993, para. 26, to be published in Series A no. 266-B).