Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,20126) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92
1 (Art. 6-1), mitigation of sentence and discontinuance of prosecution on account of the excessive length of proceedings do not in principle deprive the individual concerned of his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 25 (Art. 25), unless the national authorities have acknowledged either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 30, para. 66). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92
3 (Art. 5-3) of the Convention, on 20 December 1990 when he was convicted at first instance (cf. Eur. Court H.R., B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, paras. 36-38). - EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92
It is essentially on the basis of the reasons given in these decisions and of the true facts mentioned by the applicant in his appeals, that the Convention organs are called upon to review the reasonableness of the length of detention (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Letellier judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, p. 18, para. 35; W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, para. 30, to be published in Series A no. 254). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92
The Commission recalls that the right of the accused in detention to have his case examined with particular expeditiousness must not hinder the efforts of the prosecution authorities to carry out their tasks with proper care (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Tomasi judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 39, para. 102; W. v. Switzerland judgment, loc. cit., para. 42).