Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 14.01.1991 - 15933/89   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1991,21271
EKMR, 14.01.1991 - 15933/89 (https://dejure.org/1991,21271)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14.01.1991 - 15933/89 (https://dejure.org/1991,21271)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Januar 1991 - 15933/89 (https://dejure.org/1991,21271)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,21271) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

    Jens Söring

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1991 - 15933/89
    1 of the Convention, interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights in its Soering judgment (Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 45 para. 113).

    The Court also left open the possibility that, exceptionally, an issue might arise under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention "by an extradition decision in circumstances where the fugitive has suffered or risks suffering a flagrant denial of a fair trial in the requesting country" (Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, paras. 81-91 and paras. 112-113).

  • EKMR, 06.10.1976 - 7317/75

    LYNAS c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1991 - 15933/89
    He referred to the Commission's decision in the case of Lynas v. Switzerland (No. 7317/75, Dec. 6.10.76, D.R. 6 p. 141) in which it held as follows:.
  • EKMR, 13.03.1989 - 14037/88

    OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1991 - 15933/89
    His first, No. 14037/88, in which he complained that his extradition to Hong Kong would be in breach of Articles 3 and 7 of the Convention, was rejected by the Commission on 13 March 1989.
  • EKMR, 02.09.1992 - 19319/91

    O. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    In his second application, No. 15933/89, he complained of his protracted detention (over 5 years) pending extradition and the refusal of bail, as well as the length of the extradition proceedings and the four habeas corpus applications he made.

    The Commission recalls the following findings it made in the applicant's second application, No. 15933/89:.

  • EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 46390/10

    AUAD v. BULGARIA

    It should, however, be pointed out that unlike that provision, Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention does not contain maximum time-limits; the question whether the length of deportation proceedings could affect the lawfulness of detention under this provision thus depends solely on the particular circumstances of each case (see Osman v. the United Kingdom, no. 15933/89, Commission decision of 14 January 1991, unreported, and Gordyeyev v. Poland (dec.), nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht