Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1998,31098
EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31098)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14.01.1998 - 27521/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31098)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Januar 1998 - 27521/95 (https://dejure.org/1998,31098)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,31098) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10857/84

    BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95
    In addition, because of the logical link between paragraphs 3 (a) and 3 (b) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-a, 6-3-b), the information about the nature and cause of the accusation must be adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defence accordingly (see No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48, p. 149).

    However, in a wider sense it protects everybody against being treated by public officials as being guilty of an offence before this is established according to law by a competent court (see No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 106).

  • EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

    ASCH v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95
    The Convention organs' task is to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see Eur. Court HR, Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 26).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80

    UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95
    The Commission finds it appropriate to examine the applicant's various complaints about the proceedings from the points of view of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-1+6-2+6-3) taken together, especially as the guarantees in paragraphs 2 and 3 represent aspects of the concept of a fair trial contained in paragraph 1 (see Eur. Court HR, Unterpertinger v. Austria judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, para. 29).
  • EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20231/92

    W.S. v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95
    20231/92, 20545/92, 23117/93 and 23223/94 concerned complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention of the length of the applicant's detention on remand; the delays of the authorities in dealing with his requests for release from detention; his request for damages; and the length of the criminal proceedings in which he was involved.
  • EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 18064/91

    HIRO BALANI v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 27521/95
    The question whether or not a court has failed to fulfil the obligation, deriving from Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, to state reasons can only be determined in the light of the circumstances of the case (see Eur. Court HR, Hiro Balami v. Spain judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-B, p. 29 et seq., para. 27).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht