Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 28332/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,32987) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
H.B. v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90
GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 28332/95
The Commission recalls the Convention organs' case-law according to which the aim of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (P7-4) is to prohibit the repetition of criminal proceedings which have been concluded by a final decision (see Eur. Court HR, Gradinger v. Austria judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-C, p. 65, para. 53).This provision does not refer to "the same offence", but refers rather to trial and punishment "again... for an offence" (see Gradinger v. Austria, Comm. Report 19.5.94, para. 75, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 328-C, p. 77).
- EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 28332/95
The Commission recalls that it is not the Convention organs' function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, para. 43). - EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 28332/95
The Convention organs' task is to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see Eur. Court HR, Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 26).