Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SLEZAK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86

  KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  The Commission has also held that a requirement of representation by a lawyer does not infringe the principles of the Convention even if the defendant is himself a lawyer (cf. No. 12350/86, Dec. 5.9.90, unpublished).
• EKMR, 15.10.1986 - 11468/85

  K. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  As to the applicant's claim that he had no effective domestic remedy under Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention when exercising his rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention, the Commission recalls that the word "remedy", within the meaning of this provision, does not mean a remedy bound to succeed, but simply an accessible remedy before an authority competent to examine the merits of a complaint (cf. No. 11468/85, Dec. 15.10.86, D.R. 50, p. 199).
• EKMR, 29.06.1994 - 23256/94

  HAVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  It also recalls that according to its case-law, domestic remedies have not been exhausted where an appeal is not admitted because of a procedural mistake by the applicant (cf., for example, No. 23256/94, Dec. 29.6.94, D.R. 78, p. 139).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88

  CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  Furthermore, the Commission finds that the monitoring of the applicant's correspondence with the Commission by the prison authorities has not hindered the effective exercise of his right of petition under Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention (cf. Campbell v. the UnitedKingdom, Comm. Report 12.7.90, paras. 73-76, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 233, p. 41; the Court, in its judgment, made no finding as to Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention; p. 23, para.
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  Nevertheless, the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-3) could be relevant in pre-trial proceedings insofar as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with them (cf. Eur. Court HR, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, para. 36).
• EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 26345/95

  SPADRNA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32487/96

  The Commission has concluded that this undoubtedly pursues the legitimate aim of ensuring a proper administration of justice (cf. No. 26345/95, Dec. 29.11.95, unpublished).

• EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 46148/99

  NOVOTNÝ contre la REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  La Cour rappelle que la condition de représentation légale devant certaines juridictions a été jugée compatible avec les exigences de l'article 6 de la Convention car elle contribue à la bonne administration de la justice (voir, par exemple, Slezák c. République tchèque, no 32487/96, décision de la Commission du 14 janvier 1998, non publiée ; Meftah et autres c. France [GC], nos 32911/96, 35237/97, 34595/97, § 41, CEDH 2002).