Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 33456/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,32994) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZVOLENSKY AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 33456/96
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedure (see, for example, Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Eur. Court HR, Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 33456/96
This implies that a fair balance must be struck between the demands of the general interests of the community and the requirement to protect the individual's fundamental rights, which balance would not be found if the individual was found to have borne an excessive burden (see Eur. Court HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, pp. 26-28, paras. 69-73). - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 33456/96
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedure (see, for example, Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Eur. Court HR, Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49). - EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86
FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 33456/96
The third rule, stated in the second paragraph, recognises that Contracting States are entitled, amongst other things, to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest (see Eur. Court HR, Fredin v. Sweden judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 14, para. 41).