Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 35220/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,31107) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 35220/97
- EGMR, 20.04.1999 - 35220/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 35220/97
The Commission recalls that a detained person must be able to take proceedings at reasonable intervals before a court to challenge the lawfulness of his detention where the nature of the deprivation of liberty under consideration would require it (Eur. Court HR, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1979, Series A no. 33). - EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 35220/97
Nevertheless, the requirements of paragraph 3(c) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-c) could be relevant in pre-trial proceedings insofar as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with them (Eur. Court HR, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, para. 36; cf. also Can v. Austria, Comm. Report 12.7.84, paras. 49, 50, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 96, pp. 15, 16). - EGMR, 30.09.1985 - 9300/81
CAN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 35220/97
Nevertheless, the requirements of paragraph 3(c) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-c) could be relevant in pre-trial proceedings insofar as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with them (Eur. Court HR, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, para. 36; cf. also Can v. Austria, Comm. Report 12.7.84, paras. 49, 50, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 96, pp. 15, 16).