Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,29254) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 02.09.1996 - 26667/95
- EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
As regards the Golder and Silver judgments of the European Court of Human Rights to which the High Court was referred "in passing" (Eur. Court HR, Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18 and Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61), the High Court noted that the facts of those cases were very different from those of the Kearney case. - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
As regards Article 6 (Art. 6), in particular, the Government submit that the right of access to court is not an absolute right (Eur. Court HR, Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment, loc. cit. and Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom judgment 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24, para. 57). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
In particular, none of the reasons offered justify interference with correspondence between a prisoner and his/her lawyer (Eur. Court HR, Campbell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233), no reasonable grounds having been advanced by the Government to open the correspondence of the applicant referred to above at (d) and (f) in the FACTS. - EGMR, 28.11.1991 - 12629/87
S. v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
1 (Art. 6-1), the applicant submits that the Government's submissions ignore the very clear jurisprudence of the Commission and Court regarding interference with and censorship of legal correspondence (Eur. Court HR, S v. Switzerland judgment of 28 November 1991, Series A no. 220). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 26667/95
As regards the Golder and Silver judgments of the European Court of Human Rights to which the High Court was referred "in passing" (Eur. Court HR, Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18 and Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61), the High Court noted that the facts of those cases were very different from those of the Kearney case.