Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LWANGA ET SEMPUNGO c. SUEDE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LWANGA AND SEMPUNGO v. SWEDEN

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

  CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.09.1995 - 27249/95

  The question to be answered is whether the enforcement at present of the expulsion order would in itself involve such a trauma to the applicants that Article 3 (Art. 3) would be violated (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas and others judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 31, paras. 83-84).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.09.1995 - 27249/95

  The right to political asylum is not protected in either the Convention or its Protocols (Eur. Court H.R., Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 102).

• EKMR, 26.10.1995 - 27776/95

  A.G. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  In this connection, the Commission further notes that, should the children be placed in compulsory psychiatric care, the expulsion could under no circumstances take place without the permission of the chief physician responsible for their care (cf. No. 27249/95, Lwanga and Sempungo v. Sweden, Dec. 14.9.95, unpublished).
• EKMR, 07.12.1995 - 28285/95

  NIKOVIC v. SWEDEN

  The Commission further notes that, should the applicant, who, apparently, is not undergoing psychiatric care at present, later be taken into compulsory psychiatric care due to his mental problems, the expulsion order could under no circumstances take place without the permission of the chief physician responsible for his care (cf. No. 27249/95, Lwanga and Sempungo v. Sweden, Dec. 14.9.95, D.R. 83-A).
• EKMR, 26.10.1995 - 28239/95

  SHABO AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  In this connection, the Commission further notes that, should the applicants be placed in compulsory psychiatric care, the expulsion could under no circumstances take place without the permission of the chief physician responsible for their care (cf. No. 27249/95, Lwanga and Sempungo v. Sweden, Dec. 14.9.95, unpublished).
• EKMR, 26.10.1995 - 28419/95

  KHARSA v. SWEDEN

  In this connection, the Commission notes that, should the applicant be taken into compulsory psychiatric care due to her mental problems, the expulsion order could under no circumstances take place without the permission of the chief physician responsible for her care (cf. No. 27249/95, Lwanga and Sempungo v. Sweden, Dec. 14.9.95, unpublished).
• EKMR, 15.01.1998 - 30408/96

  JÄRVINEN v. FINLAND

  The assessment of this minimum is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, the manner and method of its execution, its duration, its physical or mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the person in question (cf. No. 27249/95, Dec. 14.9.95, D.R. 83-A, p. 91 and No. 27776/95, Dec. 26.10.95, D.R. 83-A, p. 101).