Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.N. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79

  Bönisch ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  However, the guarantees contained in paragraph 3 are constituent elements, amongst others, of the concept of a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1. Therefore, the Commission considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under the general rule of paragraph 1 of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, whilst having due regard to the guarantees of paragraph 3 (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Bönisch judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, pp. 14/15, para. 29; Brandstetter judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 20, para. 42).
• EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

  ASCH v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  It is the task of the Convention organs to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was taken, were fair (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Isgrò judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 194-A, p. 11, para. 31; Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 26).

 
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  However, the guarantees contained in paragraph 3 are constituent elements, amongst others, of the concept of a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1. Therefore, the Commission considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under the general rule of paragraph 1 of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, whilst having due regard to the guarantees of paragraph 3 (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Bönisch judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, pp. 14/15, para. 29; Brandstetter judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 20, para. 42).
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• KAG Münster, 11.02.2016 - 14/15

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung; Eingruppierung und Stufenzuordnung bei …

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.10.1992 - 19205/91

  However, the guarantees contained in paragraph 3 are constituent elements, amongst others, of the concept of a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1. Therefore, the Commission considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under the general rule of paragraph 1 of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, whilst having due regard to the guarantees of paragraph 3 (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Bönisch judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, pp. 14/15, para. 29; Brandstetter judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 20, para. 42).