Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BECK v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  Moreover, it is for the State to prove that there exist available remedies which have not been utilised by those concerned (see Eur. Court HR, Deweer v. Belgium judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 15 and 16, paras. 26 and 29, with further references; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39).
• EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

  DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  Moreover, it is for the State to prove that there exist available remedies which have not been utilised by those concerned (see Eur. Court HR, Deweer v. Belgium judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 15 and 16, paras. 26 and 29, with further references; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  Moreover, the Court has recognised that some measure of control over prisoners' correspondence is called for and is not of itself incompatible with the Convention (cf., Eur. Court HR, Silver and others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, pp. 37-38, paras. 97-98).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88

  CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  Problems may arise under the Convention inter alia where there has been an interference with an inmate's correspondence with his solicitor or with European human rights control bodies (cf., Eur. Court HR, Campbell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233).
• EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 11471/85

  CRÉMIEUX v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  As regards the question of necessity, the Commission recalls that the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the need for an interference, but it goes hand in hand with European supervision (Eur. Court HR, Crémieux v. France judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-B, p. 62, para. 38).
• EKMR, 04.07.1978 - 7742/76

  A.B. et SOCIETE A.S. c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 23198/94

  However, the Convention only governs, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to its entry into force with respect to that Party (cf. No. 7742/76, Dec. 4.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 146).