Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24967/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,24459) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MORTENSEN v. DENMARK
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 24967/94
- EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24967/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24967/94
For the purposes of this provision it is sufficient that the applicant, through the police interrogations or preliminary court hearings, has been made aware in sufficient detail of the accusations against him (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Kamasinski judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, pp. 36-37, paras. 79-81). - EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88
Klaus Croissant
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24967/94
The Commission recalls that a system whereby a convicted person is in principle bound to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the fees of his court-appointed counsel is not incompatible with Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, provided this does not adversely affect the fairness of the proceedings (cf. Eur. Court of H.R., Croissant judgment of 25 September 1992, Series A no. 237-B, pp. 34-35, paras. 33-38). - EGMR, 22.11.1995 - 20166/92
S.W. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24967/94
Nevertheless, however clearly drafted a legal provision may be there remains an inevitable element of judicial interpretation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., S.W. v. United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, paras. 34-35).