Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,23952) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JUPIN v. SWEDEN
Art. 6, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
- EKMR, 22.10.1997 - 25994/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EKMR, 05.04.1994 - 21283/93
TYLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission refers, on this point, to the established case-law of the Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (cf., e.g., No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 81, 88, and Eur. Court H.R., Klaas v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, para. 29). - EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 12547/86
BENDENOUN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission considers that this complaint raises the issue whether the case in question, in so far as it concerned the imposition of a tax supplement, involved a determination of a criminal charge within the meaning of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention and, if so, whether the applicant was afforded the guarantees of this provision in the relevant proceedings (cf. No. 11464/85, von Sydow v. Sweden, Dec. 12.5.87, D.R. 53 p. 85, and Eur. Court H.R., Bendenoun v. France judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284). - EKMR, 14.12.1988 - 13013/87
WASA Ömsesidigt, Försäkringsbolaget Valands Pensionsstiftelse, a group of …
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission recalls its established case-law according to which Article 6 (Art. 6) is not applicable to proceedings regarding taxation (cf., e.g., No. 11189/84, Dec. 11.12.86, D.R. 50 p. 121, and No. 13013/87, Dec. 14.12.88, D.R. 58 p. 163).
- EKMR, 12.05.1987 - 11464/85
S. v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission considers that this complaint raises the issue whether the case in question, in so far as it concerned the imposition of a tax supplement, involved a determination of a criminal charge within the meaning of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention and, if so, whether the applicant was afforded the guarantees of this provision in the relevant proceedings (cf. No. 11464/85, von Sydow v. Sweden, Dec. 12.5.87, D.R. 53 p. 85, and Eur. Court H.R., Bendenoun v. France judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284). - EKMR, 11.12.1986 - 11189/84
SOCIETE S. ET T. c. SUEDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission recalls its established case-law according to which Article 6 (Art. 6) is not applicable to proceedings regarding taxation (cf., e.g., No. 11189/84, Dec. 11.12.86, D.R. 50 p. 121, and No. 13013/87, Dec. 14.12.88, D.R. 58 p. 163). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25994/94
The Commission refers, on this point, to the established case-law of the Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (cf., e.g., No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 81, 88, and Eur. Court H.R., Klaas v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, para. 29).