Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BADER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83

  GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  Article 10 (Art. 10) does not, in general, confer on the individual a right of access to a register containing information on his personal position, nor does it embody an obligation on Governments to impart such information to the individual (Eur. Court H.R., Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p.29, para. 74; Gaskin judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 21, para. 52).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  Article 10 (Art. 10) does not, in general, confer on the individual a right of access to a register containing information on his personal position, nor does it embody an obligation on Governments to impart such information to the individual (Eur. Court H.R., Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p.29, para. 74; Gaskin judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 21, para. 52).
• EKMR, 11.05.1984 - 10039/82

  LEIGH, GUARDIAN NEWSPAPERS Ltd., THE OBSERVER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  The Commission finds therefore that the applicant can only claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 10 (Art. 10) of the Convention insofar he may be understood to complain that the Austrian authorities did not inform the applicant sufficiently on the above issues (see No. 7045/75, Dec. 10.12.76, D.R. 7 p. 87; No. 9297/81, Dec. 1.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 204; No. 10039/82, Dec. 11.5.84, D.R. 38 p. 74).

 
• EKMR, 01.03.1982 - 9297/81

  Association X. c. SUEDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  The Commission finds therefore that the applicant can only claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 10 (Art. 10) of the Convention insofar he may be understood to complain that the Austrian authorities did not inform the applicant sufficiently on the above issues (see No. 7045/75, Dec. 10.12.76, D.R. 7 p. 87; No. 9297/81, Dec. 1.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 204; No. 10039/82, Dec. 11.5.84, D.R. 38 p. 74).
• EKMR, 10.12.1976 - 7045/75

  X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  The Commission finds therefore that the applicant can only claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 10 (Art. 10) of the Convention insofar he may be understood to complain that the Austrian authorities did not inform the applicant sufficiently on the above issues (see No. 7045/75, Dec. 10.12.76, D.R. 7 p. 87; No. 9297/81, Dec. 1.3.82, D.R. 28 p. 204; No. 10039/82, Dec. 11.5.84, D.R. 38 p. 74).
• EKMR, 03.10.1975 - 7096/75

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  However, the Commission recalls that the obligation of the High Contracting Parties under this provision are limited to the field of elections concerning the choice of the legislature and do not extend to referenda (see No. 7096/75, Dec. 3.10.75, D.R. 3 p. 165).

• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  23868/94 and 23869/94, Commission decision of 24 February 1995, DR 80, p. 162; Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996; Nurminen and Others v. Finland, no. 27881/95, Commission decision of 26 February 1997; and Grupo Interpres SA v. Spain, no. 32849/96, Commission decision of 7 April 1997, DR 89, p. 150) and by the Court, which in paragraph 74 of its 1987 judgment in the Leander case set out the approach which was to become the standard jurisprudential position on the matter in later years:.
• EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 31981/96

  HILBE contre le LIECHTENSTEIN

  Quant au fond, la Cour rappelle que les obligations des Etats contractants en vertu de l'article 3 du Protocole no1 se limitent aux élections parlementaires et ne s'appliquent pas aux référendums (voir no 26633/95, déc.15.3.1996, non publiée).
• EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 12626/13

  MCLEAN AND COLE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Convention organs have emphasised on a number of occasions that Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 is limited to elections concerning the choice of the legislature and does not apply to referendums (see X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 7096/75, Commission decision of 3 October 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 3, p. 165; Bader v. Germany, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996, unreported; Castelli and Others v. Italy, nos.
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 22962/15

  MOOHAN ET GILLON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Au contraire, ils ont dit sans équivoque que cet article ne s'appliquait qu'aux élections portant sur le choix du corps législatif et non aux référendums (X. c. Royaume-Uni, décision précitée, Bader c. Autriche (déc.), no 26633/95, décision de la Commission du 15 mai 1996, non publiée, Nurminen et autres c. Finlande (déc.), no 27881/95, 26 février 1997, Castelli et autres c. Italie, nos 35790/97 et 38438/97, décision de la Commission du 14 septembre 1998, DR 94, p. 102, Hilbe c. Liechtenstein (déc.), no 31981/96, CEDH 1999-VI, Borghi c. Italie (déc.), no 54767/00, CEDH 2002-V (extraits), Z. c. Lettonie, no 14755/03, 24 janvier 2008, Niedzwiedz c. Pologne (déc.), no 1345/06, 11 mars 2008, et McLean et Cole, décision précitée, § 32).
• EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 48818/17

  CUMHURIYET HALK PARTISI v. TURKEY

  It follows, as the Court has previously held, that the ordinary meaning of the language used in Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 limits its application to elections concerning the choice of the legislature, held at reasonable intervals, and does not apply to referendums (see X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 7096/75, Commission decision of 3 October 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 3; Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996, unreported; Nurminen v. Finland (dec.), no. 27881/95, 26 February 1997; Castelli and Others v. Italy, nos.