Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 29069/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,29596) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HIIPAKKA AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 29069/95
Events prior to 10 May 1990 will be taken into account merely as a background to the issues before the Commission (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Hokkanen judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 19, para. 53). - EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86
FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 29069/95
The three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Fredin judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 14, para. 41). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 29069/95
Furthermore, the requirement that a deprivation must be "subject to the conditions provided for by law" presupposes the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise domestic legal provisions (Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow and Others judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 47, para. 110).